Mick Cronin has a very distinct style in college basketball.
Slower, controlled, disciplined, defense-minded players usually fuel Cronin's rosters, and while this style of play may work for many teams, there's an argument to be made that this line of thinking may not be the best thing for UCLA moving forward.
For starters, many of Cronin's transfer players come from teams with a much higher pace than UCLA last season. If Cronin's mindset were less set on that style of play, it could allow many of his players to avoid altering the playing style they are used to.
UCLA's Transfers Have Experience at Higher Tempo
For instance, Sergej Macura, Filip Jovic, and Azavier Robinson all come to UCLA as transfers, and each of their previous schools played at a pace much faster than UCLA. The Bruins ranked 308th in adjusted tempo nationally last season among all Division I teams, according to KenPom.
Comparatively, Auburn (Jovic) ranked 179th, Mississippi State (Macura) ranked 64th, and Butler (Azavier Robinson) ranked 107th.
If Cronin adopted a faster-paced offense, it could help bridge the gap between what these transfers have experienced at their previous schools.
It could even benefit a player like Jaylen Petty. Texas Tech is ranked on the slower side in terms of pace, but Petty's individual game reflects a much faster approach. Petty is an electric player who could benefit from a faster style of play, rather than the slow, controlled game Cronin teaches.
One of the reasons that a slower pace is usually prioritized is better control and ball security. Obviously, teams should strive to keep the ball safe, but it could be worth playing a bit faster and accepting a few turnovers to maximize the style of play these transfers offer.
Slower Pace Has Succeeded Many Times
Cronin's style absolutely can work. The argument isn't that a slower pace leads to less success, because that is simply not true. Illinois is a team that UCLA plays very similarly to, and the Fighting Illini advanced all the way to the Final Four with the same style of play as the Bruins.
Even UConn had a pace similar to UCLA last season, and it finished as the national runner-up. There is plenty of evidence that Cronin's style can work, and those teams just proved that. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that style would be the best option for this particular UCLA roster.
Building a good roster in college basketball is more than finding great players; it's about putting those players in positions to succeed. If several of UCLA's newcomers have experience playing at different tempos, why bring them all in if you're going to force them all into the same one?
Today's best reads
- This UCLA Newcomer Could Emerge As Bruins' Leading Scorer
- What Mick Cronin Needs To Prove at UCLA in 2026-27
- Why UCLA Basketball's Rotation Could Be Deeper Than Expected
- UCLA Basketball Picking Up Steam With Elite 2028 Recruit
- UCLA's Potential Best Defender Might Need Time To Develop
This article was originally published on www.si.com/college/ucla as How UCLA's New Transfers Could Change Mick Cronin's Approach.
